Category: Uncategorized

In this blogpost, we are going to share free articles and resources which we think can help you develop a cohesive approach and progression for writing in your school.

• The first article is about the importance of developing a whole-school vision for writing teaching [LINK].

• Next, this article shares the Writing For Pleasure centre’s complete programme of study. This could act as inspiration for creating your own programme of study [LINK].

• The following links provide guidance and inspiration for establishing a progression of key genres, including: narrative [LINK], non-fiction [LINK] and poetry [LINK].

• This resource provides exemplification of how children’s writing typically develops through the EYFS-KS2. It also provides details on how children’s writing in key genres progresses over time and the types of craft moves they should be typically using and applying [LINK].

• This article shares the long-term planning advice for our Writing For Pleasure schools. This is obviously important. We share this to help you consider your own long-term planning [LINK].

• This article shares advice on how to plan a successful writing unit [LINK].

• Here is an article about the components of an effective writing lesson [LINK].

• This article is about how to get writing instruction right during a writing lesson [LINK]

• These articles may also be useful. The first is an article about conducting Author’s Chair and class sharing [LINK]. The next is about how Writing For Pleasure teachers are always teaching [LINK]. 

• Finally, we share guidance on teaching writing and the new Ofsted framework [LINK].

***

Don’t forget that we provide INSET and residency training. Please get in touch if this is something you’re interested in.

In this blogpost, we are going to share articles and resources which we think can help you with your school’s action plan.

• The first article is about the importance of developing a whole-school vision for writing teaching [LINK].

• Next, we have an article which challenges you and your colleagues to consider what sort of writing teachers you are and want to be [LINK]. 

• This article shares the 14 principles of effective writing teaching. This can help you evaluate your school’s current approach to writing against evidence-based research recommendations [LINK].

• This resource will help your staff audit their existing practice against these 14 principles of effective writing teaching. This is a great place to start and is something we routinely do during our school residency training with schools [LINK].

• You can invite teachers to consider how well they are currently meeting the EYFS Early Learning Goals and STA Writing Framework Statements (including the greater-depth statements) by using this audit. If there are certain statements teachers are routinely finding hard to achieve, we have supplied a list of teaching practices and resources which will help. Again, this is something we typically use during our school residency training with schools [LINK].

• You may find these handouts useful. They explain what the KS1 and KS2 STA Writing Statements really mean and how they can be achieved [KS1 – LINK] [KS2 – LINK]. 

• It’s also important to investigate the thoughts and feelings of your pupils. Our Children As Writers survey helps you collect valuable data and even provides you with a report, suggesting certain teaching practices to help you improve your teaching [LINK].

• Finally, we share guidance on teaching writing and the new Ofsted framework [LINK].

***

Don’t forget that we provide INSET and residency training. Please get in touch if this is something you’re interested in.

Working at the expected standard: Write simple, coherent narratives about personal experiences and those of others (real or fictional)

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see a selection of writing which showcases a child’s ability to write stories and personal narratives (memoirs). 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of class writing projects [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Write about real events, recording these simply and clearly

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see a selection of writing which showcases a child’s ability to write personal narratives (memoirs) and information texts.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of class writing projects [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Demarcate most sentences in their writing with capital letters and full stops, and use question marks correctly

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children using certain punctuation craft moves and see evidence that they have attended to their punctuation through proof-reading.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Teach sentence-level craft moves [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use present and past tense mostly correctly and consistently

To achieve this standard, ensure there is evidence showing how children have attended to their verb tense use to ensure that it remains consistent. For children with English as an additional language, this is often a particular area of focus [LINK].

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what grammar craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• Plan Use Of Vocabulary sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use some co-ordination and subordination to join clauses

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children using certain grammar and sentence-level craft moves in their writing.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Teach sentence-level craft moves [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Segment spoken words into phonemes and represent these by graphemes, spelling many of these words correctly and making phonically-plausible attempts at others

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children writing ‘sound spellings’. We’d also see evidence of children attending to their spellings by proof-reading. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach children encoding strategies and how to write ‘sound spellings’ [LINK].
• Deliver explicit spelling instruction [LINK].
• Plan Spelling sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].
• For children who need it, provide additional encoding instruction and practice [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Spell many common exception words

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children attending to their spellings by proof-reading. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Deliver explicit spelling instruction [LINK].
• Plan Spelling sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Form capital letters and digits of the correct size, orientation and relationship to one another and to lower-case letters

To achieve this standard, we’d expect a child’s writing portfolio to showcase some examples of correctly formed letters and the use of capital letters.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Deliver explicit handwriting instruction [LINK].
• Provide additional instruction and practice for children who need it [LINK].
• Integrate your handwriting instruction and pupil-conferencing into publishing sessions.
• For book-making projects, ask children to write up their favourite page in their best handwriting [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use spacing between words that reflects the size of the letters.

To achieve this standard, we’d expect a child’s writing portfolio to showcase some examples of ‘finger spaces’.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach children to use finger spaces [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Write effectively and coherently for different purposes, drawing on their reading to inform the vocabulary and grammar of their writing

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see a selection of writing which showcases a child’s ability to write for different purposes. To help with this, we provide children and teachers with the six most common reasons we are moved to write. These are the typical purposes for writing. They include:

(Figures from Young & Ferguson 2020 p.5-7)

Of course, these aren’t static. They can be used in conjunction with one another. Indeed, by combining different writing purposes together, children and teachers can enhance their texts. For example, teaching people in a way that is entertaining can enhance our audience’s reading experience. Alternatively, writing a reflective memoir whilst painting with words can bring an artistry and literary quality to our memories. This is something to look out for when assessing a child’s portfolio.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of class writing projects [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Make simple additions and revisions to their own writing

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children making changes to their writing and illustrations. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Have revision checklist sessions where children can reflect on their use of the product goals and ‘try out’ any that they may have overlooked [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Make simple proof-reading corrections to their own writing

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children proof-reading their manuscripts for capitalisation, use of vocabulary, punctuation and spelling. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Use the punctuation taught at Key Stage One mostly correctly

To achieve this standard, ensure that, across a portfolio of writing, children have used the range of punctuation taught at Key Stage One. This includes: capitalisation, end marks (full stops, questions marks and exclamation marks), commas for a list, apostrophes for singular possession and apostrophes for contractions.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Teach sentence-level craft moves [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Spell many common exception words

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children attending to their spellings by proof-reading. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Deliver explicit spelling instruction [LINK].
• Plan Spelling sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Add suffixes to spell most words correctly in their writing

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children attending to their spellings by proof-reading. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Deliver explicit spelling instruction [LINK].
• Plan Spelling sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Use the diagonal and horizontal strokes needed to join some letters

To achieve this standard, we’d expect a child’s writing portfolio to showcase some examples of diagonal and horizontal strokes and some joined handwriting.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Deliver explicit handwriting instruction [LINK].
• Provide additional instruction and practice for children who need it [LINK].
• Integrate your handwriting instruction and pupil-conferencing into publishing sessions.
• For book-making projects, ask children to write up their favourite page in their best handwriting [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Write effectively for a range of purposes and audiences, selecting language that shows good awareness of the reader

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see a selection of writing which showcases a child’s ability to write for different purposes and for different audiences. To help with this, we provide children and teachers with the six most common reasons we are moved to write. These are the typical purposes for writing. They include:

(Figures from Young & Ferguson 2020 p.5-7)

Of course, these aren’t static. They can be used in conjunction with one another. Indeed, by combining different writing purposes together, children and teachers can enhance their texts. For example, teaching people in a way that is entertaining can enhance our audience’s reading experience. Alternatively, writing a reflective memoir whilst painting with words can bring an artistry and literary quality to our memories. This is something to look out for when assessing a child’s portfolio.

In terms of audience, a child’s portfolio should show how they’ve written for or to different people. For example, you might see them writing for younger children, writing for their peers and writing to people in positions of power and influence. You might see how they are writing to people they know well or to people they’ve never met. You will notice how they have taken their audiences’ needs and tastes into account when writing.  

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of class writing projects [LINK].
• Set a publishing goal for class writing projects [LINK].
• Discuss your audiences and what they might want or need from you [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].
• Have revision checklist sessions where children can reflect on their use of the product goals and ‘try out’ any that they may have overlooked [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: In narratives, describe settings, characters and atmosphere 

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children writing flash-fiction and short story pieces. These narratives would showcase their use of setting, character and atmosphere craft moves. To help with this, we provide an apprenticeship and progression across Key Stage Two. In Year Three, children are expected to write fairytales and fables. The focus here is on plot and understanding different emotional story arcs. Next, in Year Four, children learn to write character-driven and setting-focused short stories. Here they learn a host of important narrative craft moves. In Year Five, they build on this knowledge and experience to write developed short stories and graphic novels. This is an opportunity to embed their understanding of setting, character and atmosphere. Finally, in Year Six, children use all that they’ve learnt to write a collection of flash-fiction pieces. This collection will showcase their abilities to attend to settings, characters and atmosphere. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Teach narrative craft moves and ensure there is a progression and development of these craft moves across KS1 and KS2 [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Integrate dialogue in narratives to convey character and advance the action

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children using dialogue as a way of revealing something about a character you wouldn’t have otherwise known. You gain just a little insight into their history, psyche, motivation or morality. How characters talk to each other and what they choose as topics of conversation tells you a lot about them. In addition, it’s an opportunity to move the story forward. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Read as writers to see how other writers use dialogue [LINK].
• Teach craft moves about dialogue and invite children to use these moves in their writing that day [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Select vocabulary and grammatical structures that reflect what the writing requires

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see how children have applied certain grammar craft moves taught by their teacher and have used them in the context of their very own writing. In addition, we’d see evidence that children have (re)considered their use of vocabulary, ensuring that their audiences will understand them easily. If they are unsure, they will take time to explain certain terms.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Discuss your audience(s) and what they might want or need from you [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what grammar craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].
• Teach grammar craft moves which match the needs of the class writing project [LINK].
• Have revision checklist sessions, where children can reflect on their use of the product goals and ‘try out’ any that they may have overlooked [LINK].
• Plan Use Of Vocabulary sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use a range of devices to build cohesion within and across paragraphs

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see children using cohesive craft moves to prevent their reader from becoming confused and to keep them on track. For example, within their portfolio of writing, you would expect to see some craft moves like colons, semi-colons, relative clauses, parenthesis, modal verbs, fronted adverbials, synonyms, headings, paragraphs, pilcrows, bullet points, conjunctions, prepositions and adverbs being used. 

In addition, it’s important to remember that a writer’s planning is also a device they use to ensure cohesion so don’t forget to include these in a child’s writing portfolio. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you teach children a variety of planning strategies and include their planning in their writing portfolios [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what grammar craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].
• Teach grammar craft moves which match the needs of the class writing project [LINK].
• Teach sentence-level craft moves which match the needs of the class writing project [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use verb tenses consistently and correctly throughout their writing

To achieve this standard, ensure there is evidence showing how children have attended to their verb tense use to ensure that it remains consistent. For children with English as an additional language, this is often a particular area of focus [LINK].

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what grammar craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• Plan Use Of Vocabulary sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Use the range of punctuation taught at Key Stage Two mostly correctly

To achieve this standard, ensure that, across a portfolio of writing, children have used the range of punctuation taught at Key Stage Two. This includes: capitalisation, end marks (full stops, question marks and exclamation marks), commas for a list, apostrophes for singular and plural possession, direct speech punctuation, brackets, dashes, semi-colons, colons, hyphens, ellipsis and commas.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Spell correctly most words from the Year 5-6 spelling list and use a dictionary to check the spelling of uncommon or more ambitious vocabulary

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see evidence of children attending to their spellings. This includes ensuring they have spelt any words from the Year 5-6 spelling list correctly. It may be useful for teachers to broaden their definition of what a dictionary actually constitutes. For example, children can check their spellings using Google search, electronic spell checkers, the book they are currently reading, common word lists, smart speakers, iPads and online dictionaries. They of course should be invited to ask their friends how certain words are spelt if they are unsure. 

With regards to the use of ambitious vocabulary, there should be evidence that children have (re)considered their vocabulary choices and used synonyms for certain words where they’ve felt it was appropriate. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Deliver explicit spelling instruction [LINK].
• Plan Spelling sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].
• Plan Use Of Vocabulary sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at the expected standard: Maintain legibility in joined handwriting when writing at speed

To achieve this standard, we’d expect a child’s writing portfolio to showcase some examples of legible handwriting. Having a genuine purpose and audience for your writing is a great reason for ensuring others can read your writing. In addition, being given time to publish and focus solely on the legibility of your handwriting is particularly useful for children who otherwise struggle. 

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Deliver explicit handwriting instruction [LINK].
• Provide additional instruction and practice for children who need it [LINK].
• Integrate your handwriting instruction and pupil-conferencing into publishing sessions.

Working at greater depth: Write effectively for a range of purposes and audiences, selecting the appropriate form and drawing independently on what they have read as models for their own writing

To achieve this standard, we’d expect to see a selection of writing which showcases a child’s ability to write for different purposes and for different audiences. You can see that they have selected the right genre for what it is they wanted to achieve. In addition, they have used craft moves which are appropriate to the type of writing they have produced. 

In addition, we expect to see children using intertextuality when coming up with their own writing ideas. Intertextuality, also known as creative play(giarism), cross-fertilization, creative reconstruction, remixing, borrowing, or ‘writing under the influence’ (Ferguson & Young 2023), is the idea that we consciously or subconsciously draw on what we read to help us with our own writing. Children will naturally use their own wider reading as mentor texts, so it’s imperative that in school they are given copious amounts of time to read independently and for pleasure, with a library of rich and varied books readily to hand. In addition, children must have time to read as writers and undertake genre study. Finally, children must be taught idea generation strategies which encourage them to engage in intertextuality.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Ensure children have time to pursue their own personal writing projects [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• Ensure children generate their own ideas for writing by teaching them a variety of idea generation strategies, particularly strategies which encourage them to use intertextuality [LINK].
• Ensure children have access to mentor texts throughout a class writing project [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Distinguish between the language of speech and writing and choose the appropriate register

Linguist Michael Halliday (cited in Young & Ferguson 2021) suggests that a piece of writing will be made up of three interrelated ‘metafunctions’. These metafunctions affect the type of language we use when writing in different genres and for different audiences. According to Halliday, the ‘register’ of a piece of writing is composed of field, tenor, and mode.

• Field is about the child choosing an appropriate idea or topic for their audience. It involves children sharing their knowledge, opinion, thoughts, creative artistry, stories, and/or reflections in a way their reader will understand, appreciate and enjoy. Put simply, does the child regularly choose suitable topics to share with their audiences?
• Tenor is about the child considering their role as the writer and how they will talk, relate to, and interact with their readership. Put simply, do they regularly ‘talk’ to their readers in a way that is appropriate?
• Mode is about discussing how best to share their information in terms of structure, visual devices and organisation, and how best to publish or perform their writing. Put simply, is their writing well organised and easily understood?

At times, you’ll meet children who understand the conventions of certain genres so well that they will actually deliberately play around or subvert them for effect. These children should certainly be considered to be achieving this statement too.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of different class writing projects [LINK].
• Set a publishing goal for class writing projects [LINK].
• Discuss your audiences and what they might want or need from you [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].
• Have revision checklist sessions where children can reflect on their use of the product goals and ‘try out’ any that they may have overlooked [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Exercise an assured and conscious control over levels of formality, particularly through manipulating grammar and vocabulary to achieve this

This statement places particular focus on children’s ability to choose an appropriate ‘tenor’ for their writing. Put simply, has the child considered their role as the writer and how they will talk, relate to, and interact with their readership? Do they regularly address their readers in a way that is appropriate? Do they use vocabulary that their reader will understand? If they are unsure, have they taken time to explain key terms or ideas?

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices:

• Make sure you have taught a variety of different class writing projects [LINK].
• Set a publishing goal for class writing projects [LINK].
• Discuss your audiences and what they might want or need from you [LINK].
• Read as writers and undertake genre study to understand what craft moves may be required for the project [LINK].
• From your genre study, establish a list of product goals for the project. This is a list of things you and the class think you will need to do or include to write successfully [LINK].
• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Have revision checklist sessions where children can reflect on their use of the product goals and ‘try out’ any that they may have overlooked [LINK].
• Plan Use Of Vocabulary sessions at the proof-reading stage [LINK].

Working at greater depth: Use the range of punctuation taught at Key Stage Two correctly and, when necessary, use such punctuation precisely to enhance meaning and avoid ambiguity

To achieve this standard, ensure that, across a portfolio of writing, children have used the range of punctuation taught at Key Stage Two. This includes: capitalisation, end marks (full stops, question marks and exclamation marks), commas for a list, apostrophes for singular and plural possession, direct speech punctuation, brackets, dashes, semi-colons, colons, hyphens, ellipsis and commas.

To help achieve this statement, consider the following teaching practices: 

• Teach grammar craft moves [LINK].
• Teach sentence-level craft moves [LINK].
• Explicitly teach proof-reading [LINK].

In this blogpost, we are going to cover three things: 

• Firstly, we are going to share with you what cognitive science has to say about children’s writing development. Spoiler – writing is really hard.
• Next, we are going to discuss how important it is that we attend to children’s affective writerly needs and their connection to academic performance.
• Finally, we are going to share what research evidence has long told us are the 14 principles of effective writing teaching.

Before we start, we’d like to give a little bit of background about ourselves. The Writing For Pleasure Centre was set up to disseminate what is presently known from research about the principles of world-class writing teaching. At The Writing For Pleasure Centre, we are continually interpreting these principles with our own school partners so we can better understand how these principles can be realised in our classrooms (Young & Ferguson 2023a). That’s what we spend the majority of my time doing. We are also invited to work generally with schools who may not wish to become ‘Writing For Pleasure’ schools but are still interested in how evidence-based practices could influence and contribute to their existing teaching.

We simply share these 14 principles as the profession’s current ‘best bet’ and as the closest thing we have at the moment to a ‘sure thing’ (Young & Ferguson 2023a).

It’s important that we recognise that you, as teachers, as dedicated and informed professionals, bring valuable experience and expertise to your own writing classrooms. There will be things that you know ‘work’. Therefore the job of this blogpost is to share the fourteen ‘ingredients’ of effective practice, and for you to think about how you might want to use them – to make your own ‘recipe’ – a recipe which works best for you and your school.

To give you some background, some years ago, my colleague Felicity Ferguson and I were teaching at our local primary school and we came to the conclusion that we were probably the worst teachers of writing in the whole entire world. We hated doing it, we hated teaching it, and our students got terrible results. Our students also hated writing and they hated us teaching it too! 

We tried all the popular approaches in the UK at the time and none of them worked. We were frustrated. We wanted to do something about it. We decided that we would build a writing pedagogy from scratch and base it on what the science and research evidence said was the most effective and affecting practice (Young & Ferguson 2021a, 2022a, 2023a). We were no longer going to leave things to chance.

The first thing we need to acknowledge is that writing is really really hard. It’s probably the most cognitively demanding thing children have to do while they are at school. As this diagram, taken from our publication The Science Of Teaching Primary Writing, shows, children have to draw on at least thirteen different cognitive resources to write well. These include: knowledge of their writing environment; knowledge of their audience and their needs as readers; their content knowledge; goal knowledge; genre knowledge; their reading abilities; their knowledge of the writer’s process; grammar knowledge; sentence-level knowledge; oral language and listening comprehension; vocabulary knowledge; transcriptional knowledge, and knowledge of their own emotional and affective writerly needs.

So writing is cognitively challenging. But it also means it’s incredibly rewarding. Children are built to desire literacy. They love making and sharing meaning, through writing, with others. They can quickly become addicted to it as a pursuit. There is no doubt about that. However, if our teaching practices don’t attend to their affective needs, children can soon find themselves hating writing and underachieve as a result. For example, research by the National Literacy Trust has shown that children who enjoy writing are eight times more likely to write above the expected standard. Children who dislike writing are seven times more likely to write below the expected standard. At present, children’s writing enjoyment is at its lowest since records began. This means we have a significant number of pupils underachieving (unnecessarily) in writing due to a lack of enjoyment. 

This diagram, taken from our publication Writing For Pleasure, shows children have certain affective (what we can call emotional and motivational needs) that must be attended to if they are going to produce their best writing. Research has shown that there is a clear link between children having these needs met and exemplary writing teaching and exceptional academic progress being achieved. These affective needs include: 

• Self-efficacy – a sense of confidence.
• Agency – feeling like they have ownership over their writing and what they would like to write about.
• Self-regulation – a feeling of competence and an ability to write well independently – without constant adult intervention.
• Volition – a need, a deep desire, to write.
• Motivation – knowing why they are producing the writing they are making – knowing what has moved them to write what they are writing.
• Writer-identity – feeling a sense that they are a real writer who does the same things other adult writers do.

If we attend to these needs, children write for pleasure. This means they not only enjoy making writing but they also feel a deep satisfaction and pride from producing writing that is of the highest possible quality.

To date, The Writing For Pleasure Centre has conducted a total of forty-six research reviews spanning more than fifty years of scientific research. First, we started with the meta-analyses. For those who might not be familiar with the term, a meta-analysis is where a researcher will group many scientific studies on a particular subject in order to identify recurring patterns of effectiveness. We then read what case studies tell us about what the best performing writing teachers do in their classrooms which makes the difference. 

We discovered that there are 14 things these teachers seem to do consistently. They are enduring principles which represent the most effective teaching practice. These principles all have a solid track record of raising standards and accelerating progress in writing. These principles are:

• Build a community of writers
• Treat every child as a writer
• Read, share, think and talk about writing
• Pursue purposeful and authentic class writing projects
• Teach the writing processes
• Set writing goals
• Be reassuringly consistent
• Pursue personal writing projects
• Balance composition & transcription
• Teach daily mini-lessons
• Be a writer-teacher
• Pupil-conference: meet children where they are
• Connect reading & writing
• Interconnect the principles

Once these principles were identified, we reviewed the research on each one to help us better understand what we could be doing in our classroom to make the difference. In the end, we decided to call our approach the Writing For Pleasure pedagogy. And now, Writing For Pleasure is just a nicer sounding synonym for the pursuit of world-class writing teaching and evidence-based practice. What we found out from all this work has since been published as a book called Writing For Pleasure: Theory, Research & Practice (Young & Ferguson 2021a).

So we’ve achieved the first aim for this blogpost – we’ve told you what the effective practices are. We now need to tell you why. It’s then up to you to decide how you might use these principles in your school. And of course, we’re hoping that many of these principles aren’t new to you. We suspect you will hear many things that you already currently do in your school. With that said, We’re hoping you hear about a few new things you might like to investigate further.

To help us, we’re going to share the ‘effect-sizes’ taken from the meta-analyses research with you. Now, anything above a +0.4 is generally considered by researchers to have a significant positive effect on children’s writing performance.

Build a community of writers – (+0.89)

Why? Because ‘classroom community is a more potent factor in students’ academic success than any particular instructional method’ and ‘little or no growth in student writing can take place in a superficial writing environment’ (Tompkins & Tway 2003; De Smedt & Van Keer 2014). This is about children coming into the writing classroom every day expecting to undertake important work. They expect to be taught and treated like writers and that they are going to be making writing for real people. Knowing that there is always a real readership for their manuscripts sets the highest possible expectations.

Treat every child as a writer – (these 14 principles support all learners)

Why? The most effective writing teachers do not confine their lower-achieving pupils to mundane writing exercises or worksheets. Instead, all children are supported to participate in class writing projects (Young & Ferguson 2022c, 2023b). The best performing teachers:

1. Hold more pupil conferences.
2. Encourage co-operative learning with more experienced friends.
3. Give short additional mini-lessons through group teaching to their pupils with SEND or EAL.
4. Write alongside their least-experienced writers.

Read, share, think and talk about writing – (+0.89)

Why? Children learn from each other’s developing compositions and from hearing how certain writing strategies, techniques, literary devices or what we call ‘craft moves’ are being applied by others (including their commercial authors, their peers and their writer-teacher) (Graham et al. 2012; Graham & Harris 2019; Young & Ferguson 2023c).

Pursue purposeful and authentic class writing projects – (+1.07)

Why? Because children’s writing outcomes are improved if they engage in challenging and extended class writing projects where they write for authentic purposes and real and varied audiences (Graham & Perin 2007; Dombey 2013; Grossman et al. 2013; Morizawa 2014).

Teach the writing processes – (+1.26)

Why? Because explicitly teaching children about the writing processes and how to use them in a self-regulating way is shown to be highly effective practice (Graham et al. 2012; Graham & Perin 2007; Morizawa 2014). The writing processes include: generating ideas, planning, drawing, talking, sharing, drafting, re-reading, revising, proof-reading and publishing (Young & Ferguson 2022d, 2022b, 2022e, 2023d).

Set writing goals – (+2.03)

Why? Goal setting is by far the most effective practice teachers can employ to improve children’s writing outcomes (Koster et al. 2015; Young & Hayden 2022). It involves setting:

1. publishing goals (children knowing who they are giving their writing to at the end of a project). LINK
2. product goals (what they need to do or include to write a great piece). LINK
3. process goals (little deadlines which are set along the way to publishing). LINK

Be reassuringly consistent (+1.75)

Why? Having a reassuringly consistent and comprehensive approach to writing teaching across your whole-school improves the quality of children’s writing (LINK, LINK, LINK). From the EYFS onwards, children need some explicit instruction, a sustained and meaningful period in which to engage in writing, and some time to share and get feedback from their teacher/peers every single day (Hall and Harding 2003; Graham et al. 2012; Morizawa 2014; Graham & Perin 2007; Graham & Sandmel 2011).

Pursue personal writing projects (+0.94 and +1.75)

Why? Children become better writers by writing (Graham et al. 2012, 2015). Giving children additional daily time to work on self-chosen personal writing projects is shown to have a positive effect on their writing development (Gadd 2014; Dombey 2013; Young & Ferguson 2021b). Giving children access to a Writing Centre, modelling how to use it, and modelling how to take materials to other areas in the provision gives us the positive effective size of +0.94 in the EYFS context (Hall et al. 2015; Young & Ferguson 2022b).

Balance composition & transcription (+0.54, +0.58 and +0.36)

Why? Early on in a writing project, the best writing teachers teach lessons focused on composition to ensure quality. Towards the end of a project, they move their focus towards teaching about transcription to ensure accuracy. This means teachers give children specific instructional time to come up with ideas, draw and/or plan (+0.54)(+1.55 for children SEND) and specific time to revise (0.64) and then proof-read their pieces prior to publication (+0.58) (Dombey 2013; Graham et al. 2015b; Graham & Harris 2019; Young & Ferguson 2022d, 2022e, 2023d). 

Additional and dedicated instruction in spelling and handwriting yields an effect size of (+0.36). However, for children with SEND who need it, it can have an effect size of +2.40 (Young & Ferguson 2023b). 

Finally, teachers in the EYFS and KS1 should focus their attention on developing children’s ‘writing fluency’ (LINK).

Teach daily mini-lessons (+1.75, +0.46, and -0.4)

Why? Teaching ‘craft knowledge’ through ‘self-regulation strategy development instruction’ is the most validated teaching practice a teacher of writing can employ (LINK). The key here is teaching a single strategy before inviting children to apply that taught strategy to their writing that day (+1.75)(+2.09 for children with SEND). The same concept applies to grammar and sentence-level teaching (+0.46) (Graham and Perin 2007; Graham et al. 2012; Grossman et al. 2013; Koster et al. 2015; Young et al. 2021; Young & Ferguson 2022f; Young & Ferguson 2021c).

Be a writer-teacher (+0.54, +2.48 for children with SEND)

Why? Put simply, it’s difficult to employ the most effective teaching practices if you aren’t a writer-teacher (Hillocks 1986; Cremin & Oliver 2017; Parr & Limbrick 2011; Troia 2014; Hall et al. 2015). Not being a writer-teacher is like trying to teach a tuba lesson without ever having played the tuba (Graves 1983, LINK, LINK).

Pupil-conference: meet children where they are (+0.80)

Why? Excessive written feedback or extensive error correction has little to no positive impact on young writers’ academic progress. Indeed, negative comments and heavy marking repeatedly result in children feeling less enthusiasm for writing, writing less, and having a low opinion of themselves as writers. In turn, this results in children doing the minimum to get by (Young & Ferguson 2021a).

However, when children receive short, positive, and focused verbal feedback from their teachers while they are actually engaged in writing, they revise their compositions to a significantly higher standard. It’s the combination of personalised instruction and immediate verbal feedback that appears to be the reason why pupil-conferencing is such a highly effective practice (Hillocks 1986; Dombey 2013; Graham & Perin 2007; Graham et al. 2012; Grossman et al. 2013; Morizawa 2014; Ferguson & Young 2021).

Connect reading & writing (+0.50, +0.76, +0.94 for children with SEND)

Why? This is what we currently know about the reading/writing connection:

• Giving children ample time to read enhances the quality of their writing.
• The more children are given an opportunity to write in reading lessons, the more their reading comprehension improves. There is also a modest improvement in their writing (+0.50). However, we have to say using a reading scheme as your writing approach is nowhere near an adequate substitute for an explicit writing approach and explicit writing lessons.
• Explicit writing instruction supports children’s reading development.

We also know that when children study mentor texts – texts which match the kind of texts they are actually going to go on to write themselves, children perform better (+0.76)(+0.94 for children with SEND).

(Koster et al. 2015; Graham & Hebert 2011; Graham et al. 2018; Young & Ferguson 2023c)

Interconnect the principles

Why? The best performing writing teachers try to blend all these principles of practice (Graham & Perin 2007; De Smedt & Van Keer 2014; Grossman et al. 2013; Gadd 2014, Morizawa 2014; Young & Ferguson 2021a).

***

We hope that you found this blogpost really affirming. As dedicated professionals, we are sure you’ve heard much of your current practice described. We therefore hope that this blogpost was reassuring but hopefully it’s given you a few new things to go away and explore too. With this in mind, you’ll find lots of free-to-access articles and examples of practice on our website. However, if you’d like to access our paid resources and support the work we do, please may we invite you to consider becoming a member. This gives you access to our complete programme of study, planning, resources and eBooks.

We also provide INSET and residency training. Please get in touch if this is something you’re interested in. 

References

• Cremin, T., Oliver, L. (2017). Teachers as writers: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 269–295
• De Smedt, F., and Van Keer, H. (2014). A research synthesis on effective writing instruction in primary education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 693–701
• Dombey, H. (2013). Teaching Writing:What the Evidence Says UKLA Argues for An Evidence-informed Approach to Teaching and Testing Young Children’s Writing. London: UKLA
• Ferguson, F., Young, R. (2021) A Guide To Pupil-conferencing With 3-11 Year Olds: Powerful Feedback & Responsive Teaching That Changes Writers Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Gadd, M. (2014). What is Critical in the Effective Teaching of Writing? Auckland:The University of Auckland.
• Graham, S., and Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle School & High Schools.Washington, DC:Alliance for Excellent Education
• Graham, S., and Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396–407.
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., and Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. In Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896.
• Graham, S., Harris, K., Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core. Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498–522
• Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015b). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547
• Graham, S., Xinghua, L., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K., and Holzapfel, J. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A metaanalysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304.
• Graham, S., and Harris, K. (2019). Evidence-based practices in writing. In Best Practices in Writing Instruction, Graham, S., MacArthur, C., and Hebert, M. (Eds.) (3rd Ed.) (pp. 3–31). New York:The Guilford Press.
• Graves, D. (1983) Writing: Children & Teachers At Work Portsmouth: Heinemann
• Grossman, P.L., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., and Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure:The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English Language Arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470
• Hall, K., Harding, A. (2003). A Systematic Review of Effective Literacy Teaching in the 4 to14 Age Range of Mainstream Schooling. London: Institute of Education.
• Hall, A., Simpson, A., Guo, Y., Wang, S. (2015) Examining the Effects of Preschool Writing Instruction on Emergent Literacy Skills: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Literacy Research and Instruction, 54:2, 115-134
• Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
• Koster, M.,Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P.F., and Van de Bergh, B. (2015).Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–274
• Morizawa, G. (2014). Nesting the Neglected ‘R’ A Design Study:Writing Instruction within a Prescriptive Literacy Program (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
• Parr, J.M., and Limbrick, L. (2010). Contextualising practice: Hallmarks of effective teachers of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 583–590.
• Tompkins, G.E., and Tway, E. (2003).The elementary school classroom. In Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts, Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J.R., and Jensen, J.M. (Eds.) (2nd Ed.) (pp. 501–511). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers
• Toria, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction. In CEEDAR. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. Hayden, T., Vasques, M. (2021) The Writing For Pleasure Centre’s Big Book Of Mini-Lessons: Lessons That Teach Powerful Craft Knowledge For 3-11 Year Olds Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2021a) Writing For Pleasure: Theory, Research & Practice London: Routledge
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2021b) A Guide To Personal Writing Projects & Writing Clubs For 3-11 Year Olds Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre 
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2021c) The Writing For Pleasure Centre’s Grammar Mini-Lessons For 5-11 Year Olds Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022a) The Science Of Teaching Primary Writing Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022b) Getting Children Up And Running As Book-Makers: Lessons For EYFS-KS1 Teachers Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022c) A Teacher’s Guide To Writing With Multilingual Children Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022d) No More: I Don’t Know What To Write… Lessons That Help Children Generate Great Writing Ideas For 3-11 Year Olds Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022e) No More: ‘My Pupils Can’t Edit!’ A Whole-School Approach To Developing Proof-Readers Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2022f) The Writing For Pleasure Centre’s Sentence-Level Instruction: Lessons That Help Children Find Their Style And Voice Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2023a) Handbook Of Research On Teaching Young Writers Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2023b) Supporting children with SEND to be great writers A guide for teachers and SENCOS Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2023c) Reading in the writing classroom: A guide to finding, writing and using mentor texts with your class Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre
• Young, R., Ferguson, F. (2023d) No More: I Don’t Know What To Write Next… Lessons That Help Children Plan Great Writing Brighton: The Writing For Pleasure Centre

Self-efficacy, also described as self-belief, self-esteem, self-worth, self-affirmation, self-integrity, positive self-image, is recognised as one of the affective domains of Writing For Pleasure. This is because it’s a vital force in children’s academic success and their writerly well-being (Young & Ferguson 2021, 2023a, 2023b).

Low self-efficacy affects young writers in profound ways. Children with low self-confidence as writers generally dislike writing. They believe they cannot improve and therefore do not seek writing advice. They write the minimum required, have low aspirations, feel a sense of learned helplessness, and have little commitment to writing projects. They express negative views of themselves, and may even be depressed (Young & Ferguson 2023a, 2023b).

Importantly, research shows that self-efficacy alone is not guaranteed to improve children’s writing performance. Instead, our teaching needs to be directed towards giving children self-efficacy alongside agency and self-regulation (Young & Ferguson 2021).

A possible hierarchy of children’s affective emotional writerly needs as articulated by Young & Ferguson 2021

Teachers can help improve struggling writers’ sense of self-efficacy by employing the following strategies:

1. Enacting a mastery through repeated practice orientation towards writing progress rather than creating a high-stakes performance culture (LINK and LINK).
2. Give children regular opportunities to share what they are crafting with their friends (LINK).
3. Establish a publishing goal with the children for class writing projects and let children hear the impact their writing has had on their readership (LINK).
4. Set product goals for class writing projects in collaboration with the students (Young & Hayden 2022).
5. Set a clear process goal for each writing session (LINK).
6. Have a clear daily routine of instruction, writing time and class sharing (Kaufman & Young 2022; Young 2023).
7. Deliver writing instruction which is in response to the class’ needs. Enact a ‘teach and invite’ routine for instruction (LINK).
8. Undertake daily pupil-conferencing (Ferguson & Young 2021).

By writing about what they know and care about, children learn that they can use their expertise to inspire and awaken the minds and hearts of others.

Research has shown that there is a profound connection between effective writing instruction and reading. For example: reading, studying and discussing mentor texts, texts which match the kind of writing children are being invited to make for themselves, can yield a positive effect of +0.76 (Young & Ferguson 2021, 2023a). For children with SEND, it can be +0.94 (Young & Ferguson 2023b). To put those numbers in context, anything above a +0.4 is generally considered to have a significant positive impact on children’s writing development. Based on the work of Stewart & Correia (2021), we consider there to be six major types of nonfiction that children like to read and write. It’s therefore important that the mentor texts we share with children reflect these options. This way, children know they can write in these ways too as part of a class writing project. The six popular types of nonfiction are:

• Traditional nonfiction (objective straight teaching)
• Browseable nonfiction (teaching through grazing)
• Narrative nonfiction (teaching through telling a story)
• Literary nonfiction (teaching and painting with words)
• ‘Doing’ nonfiction (teaching by getting them doing)
• Faction (teaching about fantasy)

***

To find out more about reading effectively in the writing classroom, why not take a look at our eBook: Reading In The Writing Classroom: A Guide To Finding, Writing And Using Mentor Texts With Your Class.

---

Really, I do one thing. I read books. I write books. I think about books. It’s one job. – Toni Morrison 

Writing is the most cognitively demanding activity we ask our pupils to undertake while they are at school. It requires them to draw on at least thirteen different cognitive resources simultaneously. Cognitive psychology has revealed the amazing complexity of what children need, and need to know, in order to learn how to write competently (Young & Ferguson 2022a). It is therefore necessary for teachers to have a pedagogy for writing which takes account of all the many different elements involved in helping children not just to write, but to write well.

Research has shown that there is a profound connection between effective writing instruction and reading (Kim et al. 2023). For example: reading, studying and discussing mentor texts, texts which match the kind of writing children are being invited to make for themselves, can yield a positive effect of +0.76 (Young & Ferguson 2021, 2023a). For children with SEND, it can be +0.94 (Young & Ferguson 2023b). To put those numbers in context, anything above a +0.4 is generally considered to have a significant positive impact on children’s writing development.

The table above shares what we currently know about the connection between reading and effective writing teaching.

In addition:

• Having children write about their reading in reading lessons can yield an effect size of +0.5 (Young & Ferguson 2020, 2021).

• Establishing product goals for a class writing project in response to studying a variety of mentor texts can yield an effect size of +2.03 (Young & Hayden 2022).

• Sharing and modelling how to use certain craft moves taken from literature before inviting children to use these craft moves for themselves in that day’s writing time can yield an effect size of +1.75. For children with SEND, this can be anything up to +2.09 (Young et al. 2021).

• A major part of reading in the writing classroom is children having an opportunity to read, discuss and hear about how you crafted your own writing. Modelling how you use your reading to support your writing, providing pupils with mentor texts you’ve written, and writing alongside your pupils can yield an effect size of 0.54. For children with SEND, this can be anything up to +2.48 (Young & Ferguson 2023b).

• Inviting children to generate and plan their own ideas for their writing (including how they can take ideas from their favourite reading) can yield an effect size of 0.54. For children with SEND, this can be +1.55 (Young & Ferguson 2022b).

***

In our eBook Reading In The Writing Classroom: A Guide To Finding, Writing And Using Mentor Texts With Your Class, we shine the spotlight on these particular aspects of research-based instructional practice and show how it can help young writers to write effectively, successfully and engagingly. We explain how teachers and students should come together to share, discuss and study mentor texts as part of a class writing project (The Writing For Pleasure Centre 2023). Writing For Pleasure teachers refuse to allow writing to remain a mystery to their pupils. Instead, through a combination of mentor texts and high-quality literature, they make writing techniques utterly explicit for their young writers. We emphasise that all children need mentor texts, from the EYFS to Year 6 and beyond.

Whole-class direct instruction, group and individualised instruction, and responsive instruction are all part of a Writing For Pleasure teacher’s practice. As the most experienced writer in their classroom, they make sure they are teaching at the beginning of a writing lesson, in the middle of it and at the end.

Whole-class direct instruction: Mini-lessons

Writing For Pleasure teachers deliver direct and explicit instruction through the principles of self-regulation strategy development instruction. This is what we like to call mini-lessons. SRSD instruction is an evidence-based teaching recommendation. Research has shown that it can result in a positive effect size of +1.75 (+2.09 for children with SEND). For context, anything over +0.4 is deemed to have a significant positive effect on children’s progress. That’s why ‘teach mini-lessons’ appears as one of our 14 principles of world-class writing teaching (Young & Ferguson 2020, 2021a, 2022a, 2022b).

SRSD instruction is about teaching children strategies which enable them to be independent writers by using for themselves what they’ve been taught. It’s one of the most validated and effective practices a teacher of writing can employ in their classroom (Young & Ferguson 2022a).

All children need high-quality teaching and explicit instruction if they are to fulfil their potential as writers. This is why SRSD instruction works so well. The concept is simple. Teach your class one writerly technique, process or strategy (what we call a craft move) before inviting them to use the move for themselves in their writing that day. Case studies show that the most effective writing teachers deliver instruction in keeping with SRSD when teaching ‘craft knowledge’ (Young et al. 2021), ‘sentence-level strategies’ (Young & Ferguson 2022c) and ‘functional grammar lessons’ (Young & Ferguson 2021b). 
It can be useful to compare SRSD instruction with The Gradual Release Of Responsibility model for instruction (Pearson & Gallagher 1983).

• I did or I do – The teacher either shares how they’ve used the craft move or models how to use it live.
• We do – The class is invited to use and apply the craft move in their own writing that day.
• You do – Children understand the value of the craft move and so continue to use it in their future writing, including in their personal writing projects (see Young & Ferguson 2021b).

I, We & You sits in stark contrast to the ineffective but common habit of ‘front loading’ writing instruction at the beginning of a writing project or lesson and proceeding to ‘cross your fingers’ in the hope that the children will remember everything you’ve tried to teach them. This kind of practice doesn’t help children to write well – least of all children with SEND (Young & Ferguson 2023).

A mini-lesson typically goes something like this:

Group and individualised instruction: Pupil-conferencing 

Pupil-conferencing is about providing children with live verbal feedback and responsive individualised instruction during writing time. It’s a mini-lesson for that individual pupil (Ferguson & Young 2021). However, in a quiet and organised classroom, ‘overhearers’ all benefit from these conversations. Pupil-conferencing is an evidence-based teaching recommendation. Research has shown that it can result in a positive effect size of +0.80. That’s why ‘pupil-conferencing’ appears as one of our 14 principles of world-class writing teaching (Young & Ferguson 2020, 2021a, 2022a, 2022b).

Conferencing is about spending a short amount of time with individuals or groups of children who you know would benefit most. In a conference, focus on one thing and teach it well. A good conference is about teaching something and being confident that, once you leave, the child will use and apply what you’ve just taught them.

A successful pupil-conference follows a very similar structure to a mini-lesson:

Responsive instruction: Author’s Chair 

Giving children a daily opportunity to read aloud their developing compositions and discuss their pieces with their teacher and peers is an evidence-based teaching recommendation. Research has shown that it can result in a positive effect size of +0.89. That’s why ‘read, share, think and talk about their writing’ appears as one of our 14 principles of world-class writing teaching (Young & Ferguson 2020, 2021a, 2022a, 2022b).

At the end of daily writing time, children should be given the opportunity to talk with their friends about how their writing pieces are coming along. This can then lead into a period of Author’s Chair. This is where the whole class gathers around an ‘author’s chair’ together. This can be an opportunity for teachers to teach responsively. Writing For Pleasure teachers are always keeping an eye out for certain craft moves or writerly behaviours children have used that they would like the rest of the class to use too. Here’s a nice routine for this kind of responsive instruction:

In summary, Writing For Pleasure teachers are always teaching. They utilise whole-class direct instruction, group and individualised instruction, and responsive instruction as part of their daily teaching practice. However, it’s important to point out that this isn’t the only routine Writing For Pleasure teachers will use. Once comfortable, there are endless ways in which you can play around with these key combinations (see LINK).

Type of instruction		Effect size
Whole-class direct instruction: Mini-lessons		+1.75 +2.09 (SEND)
Group and individualised instruction:Pupil-conferencing		+0.80
Responsive instruction: Class sharing and Author’s Chair		+0.89

Setting process goals is arguably the most effective thing a teacher of writing can do in the classroom. Research has shown that it can result in a positive effect size of +2.03. For context, anything over +0.4 is deemed to have a significant positive effect on children’s progress. That’s why goal setting appears as one of our 14 principles of world-class writing teaching (Young & Ferguson 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023a).

All children, but particularly struggling or less experienced writers, need to know exactly what they are meant to be doing during writing time (the process goal) and how to do it (the mini-lesson) (Young & Ferguson 2023b). Therefore a writing lesson should typically go something like this:

A process goal is the thing you want children to get done in that day’s writing session. The more explicit and elegant the goal can be – the better. For example:

• Today, our goal is to plan our stories using the Story River technique. 
• Today, our goal is to write the opening chunk of our story.
• Today, our goal is to draft five lines – and only five lines!
• Today, our goal is to write the second page of our Information Books.
• Today, our process goal is to draft the end chunk to our discussion texts.
• Today, our goal is to make the final page of our picturebooks.
• Today our goal is to check our writing against our Revision Checklist.
• Today, our goal is for the last few children to finish revising their pieces.
• Today, our process goal is to check for capitalisation. 
• Today, our goal is to check our use of tense.
• Today, our process goal is to check punctuation – specifically our speech punctuation.
• Today, our goal is to check our common word spellings.
• Today, our process goal is to correct our ‘temporary spellings’.

You know you’ve set an appropriate process goal if it can be easily achieved by all pupils in the time allocated. In Writing For Pleasure schools, children know that once they’ve achieved the process goal for that lesson, they are free to work on their own personal writing project (see our eBook A Guide To Personal Writing Projects for more details). This ensures children get the maximum opportunity possible to write for a sustained period every day.

Therefore, if you find your class isn’t routinely finishing writing sessions by working on their personal writing projects, you know you’ve got a problem.