The conversations with the writers in my classroom feels satisfying, genuine and useful. -Nancie Atwell
Description of the principle
A rich response to children’s writing is crucial.
Many teachers use both written and verbal feedback. Research particularly emphasises the usefulness of ‘live’ verbal feedback, which is immediate, relevant and allows children to reflect on and attend to learning points while actually still engaged in their writing. It is seen as superior to ‘after-the-event’ written feedback.
Verbal feedback is given through conferences, which will be short and are most successful in a settled, focused and self-regulating classroom.
Teachers give feedback initially on composition and prioritise those who are in most need of assistance. Only later into the child’s process do they attend to transcriptional issues.
Finally, writer-teachers are better able to advise and give feedback because they understand from personal experience the issues children encounter when writing.
What Writing For Pleasure teachers do
- Teachers believe that a rich response to children’s writing was crucial. Whilst they use both written and verbal feedback, they particularly emphasize the usefulness of ‘live’ verbal feedback, which they feel is immediate, relevant and allows the child to reflect on and attend to learning points raised while still actually engaged in their writing.
- Conferences are short, friendly, supportive and incredibly positive. The children look forward to these ‘conversations’ because they know they will receive genuine praise for and celebration of the writing goals they are achieving and also good advice as to how they can improve their developing compositions further.
- The teachers are able to undertake pupil-conferencing in a systematic way and are successful because their children and classrooms are settled, focused, highly-organised and self-regulating. Behavioural expectations are also made very clear.
Reviewing your practice:questions to consider
- Do you make children feel emotionally secure and that they can talk with them about their writing?
- Do you conduct pupil-conferencing in a systematic way and appreciate this is the most effective way of giving feedback?
- Do you listen carefully to children’s writing issues before giving direct and clear advice on how to deal with it – ensuring the child feels confident in enacting the advice before moving leaving?
- Do you provide conferences which have an ‘enabling’ feeling about them – with self-regulation clearly a high priority?
- Do you use group conferencing by trying to bring ‘overhearers’ into any conversation that may be fruitful to the children involved?
- Do you discuss writing through a mastery rather than a performance perspective?
- Do you focus on the writing goals achieved in a child’s writing and also set new ones?
- Do you provide feedback and writerly advice to children during class sharing time?
- Do you use after-the-event written feedback only when they feel it will make a difference?
Examples from the classroom
How’s It Going? Getting Started With Pupil Conferencing
Suggested further reading
- Anderson, C., (2000) How’s it going USA: Heinemann
- Bayraktar, A., (2012) Teaching writing through teacher-student writing conferences In Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 51 pp.709 – 713
- Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–274.
- Calkins, L., Ehrenworth, M., (2016) Growing extraordinary writers: leadership decisions to raise the level of writing across a school and a district In The Reading Teacher Vol.70(1) 7-18
- Daniels, H., Zemelman, S., (2005) Conferences: The core of the workshop In Teaching the best practice way: Methods that matter K-12 Stenhouse: USA
- Diab, N., (2011) Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing Assessing Writing 16 pp. 274–292.
- Dix, S., Cawkwell, C., (2011) The influence of peer group response: building a teacher and student expertise in the writing classroom In English Teaching Practice & Critique 10(4) 41-57
- Ebsworth, M., (2014) The Many Faces of Feedback on Writing: A Historical Perspective In Writing & Pedagogy 6(2) 195-221
- Elliott, V., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T.N., Ingram, J., Thompson, I., Usher, N., Zantout, M., Richardson, J. & Coleman, R. (2016) A marked improvement? A review of the evidence on written marking. [https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/EEF_Marking_Review_April_2016.pdf] Education Endowment Foundation.
- Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991) Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337–372.
- Fisher, R., Jones, S., Larkin, S. & Myhill, D., (2010) Using talk to support writing London: SAGE
- Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. A. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
- Jean, E., Tree, F., & Clark, B., (2013) Communicative Effectiveness of Written Versus Spoken Feedback In Discourse Processes, 50:5, 339-359
- Kaufman, D., (2000) Conferences & Conversations: Listening to the Literate Classroom USA: Heinemann
- Larson, J. (1999) Analyzing participation frameworks in a kindergarten writing activity: The role of overhearer in learning to write In Written Communication 16: 225−257
- Leahy, S., Wiliam, D., (2009) From teachers to schools: scaling up professional development for formative assessment [Accessed: https://www.dylanwiliam.org/Dylan_Wiliams_website/Papers.html 23 April 2019]
- Rosenthall, B. D. (2006). Improving elementary-age children’s writing fluency: A comparison of improvement based on performance feedback frequency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
- Wiliam, D., (2011) Embedded Formative Assessment Solution Tree Press: USA